University of Illinois Extension serving Christian, Jersey, Macoupin and Montgomery Counties
#1 Industrial Park Dr.
Hillsboro, IL 62049
Hours: Monday - Friday 8 am to 12 pm, 1 pm to 4:30 pm
1120 N Webster St.
Taylorville, IL 62568
Hours: Monday - Friday 8am to 11:30am, 12:30pm to 4.30pm
201 W. Exchange St.
Jerseyville, IL 62052
Hours: Tuesday & Wednesday 8 am to 12 pm and 1 pm to 4:30 pm and Thursday 8 am to 12 pm
#60 Carlinville Plaza
Carlinville, IL 62626
Hours: Monday - Thursday 8 am to 12 pm; 1 pm to 4:30 pm
Sideways price pattern to continue for corn.
November 4, 2015
Source: Darrel Good, 217-333-4716, firstname.lastname@example.org
News writer: Debra Levey Larson, 217-244-2880, email@example.com
URBANA, Ill. – The corn market was relatively uneventful during the first two months of the 2015-16 marketing year. There were no large supply surprises, and known consumption was somewhat lackluster. As a result, corn prices traded in a choppy but mostly sideways pattern, says a University of Illinois agricultural economist.
“Although market expectations about the magnitude of the U.S. average corn yield and size of the crop have varied over the past three months, USDA forecasts have been very stable,” said Darrel Good. “The USDA’s 2015 yield forecast has changed very little from the initial forecast of 168.8 bushels in August, dropping to 167.5 bushels in September, and rebounding to 168 bushels in October. The production forecast declined by only 131 million bushels, slightly less than 1 percent, from August to October. In addition, the USDA estimate of Sept. 1 stocks of old-crop corn came in almost exactly as forecast. New yield and production forecasts will be released on Nov. 10. Changes from the October forecasts are expected to be modest.”
According to Good, corn export inspections and export sales so far in the 2015-16 marketing year have been disappointing. For the year, the USDA projects that U.S. corn exports will reach 1.85 billion bushels, only slightly less than exports of 1.864 billion bushels last year. Cumulative export inspections during the first two months of the year were reported at only 206 million bushels, compared to 270 million bushels during the same period last year. Export commitments for the year (shipments plus outstanding sales) as of Oct. 22 were reported at 496 million bushels, compared to commitments of 738 million bushels on the same date last year. Commitments to Japan, typically the largest importer of U.S. corn, are down 42 percent, while commitments to Mexico, typically the second largest importer, are up 4 percent year over year.
“The seasonal pattern of exports and export sales differs from year to year, particularly sales to Japan, so early export performance is not always a good indicator of marketing-year exports,” Good said. “In addition, the official Census Bureau estimates of monthly exports (not yet available for September or October) often deviate from the export inspection estimates. Still, the slow start to the 2015-16 export program and prospects for ongoing competition from Brazilian exports due to large supplies and favorable exchange rates raise concerns that marketing-year exports will fall short of the current projection. Reports last week that some Brazilian corn was headed to the United States did not improve the U.S. export outlook.”
The USDA will release the estimate of the amount of corn used for ethanol production during September 2015 on Nov. 2. Weekly estimates of ethanol production from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) indicated that domestic ethanol production in September and the first three weeks of October exceeded that of a year ago by nearly 5 percent, suggesting corn consumption was also up about 5 percent, Good said.
“Ethanol production and corn consumption will continue to be supported by increasing domestic gasoline consumption and robust exports, but the large year-over-year increase in ethanol production experienced so far this year will not persist,” Good said. “Weekly ethanol production accelerated about this time last year. Production during the third week of October this year, for example, was about equal to that of a year ago.
“For the year, the USDA projects the amount of corn used for ethanol and co-product production at 5.25 billion bushels, about 1 percent more than consumed last year,” Good said. “Use may exceed that projection, but probably not by enough to alter the prospects for abundant year-ending corn stocks. The EPA’s final rule making for the Renewable Fuel Standards for 2014, 2015, and 2016, expected by the end of the month, will provide more insight on ethanol production prospects.”
The USDA projects feed and residual use of corn during the current marketing year at 5.275 billion bushels, only slightly less than used last year. Good said that the pace of consumption will not be known until the USDA releases the estimate of Dec. 1, 2015, corn stocks in the second week of January. In the meantime, prospects for feed consumption are derived primarily from changes in livestock and poultry inventories and production intentions.
“Current inventories provide a bit of a mixed picture,” Good said. “The milk cow inventory in September was about 1 percent larger than the inventory of a year ago, the number of cattle on feed on Oct. 1 was up 2 percent, and the Sept. 1 inventory of market hogs was up 4 percent. In contrast, the layer flock is recovering slowly from the effects of bird flu, and the September inventory was down 8 percent year over year. In addition, weekly broiler chick placements were less than those of a year ago in five of the seven weeks that ended Oct. 24. Although the Dec. 1 corn stocks estimate could provide a surprise because it will reflect ‘residual’ use of corn as well as feed use, current livestock numbers suggest that feed use should be near that of last year.”
According to Good, March 2016 corn futures have traded in a sideways pattern, with a range of about 95 cents over the past year, about 40 cents over the past four months, and about 15 cents over the past three weeks. “The current price is near the low end of that range,” he said. “A broad sideways price pattern is expected to continue through the winter months. A test of the high side of the price range will likely require a threat on the supply side, either in South America this year or the U.S. next year.”
Local Contact: Gary Letterly, Extension Educator, Energy and Environmental Stewardship, firstname.lastname@example.org