University of Illinois Extension serving Christian, Jersey, Macoupin and Montgomery Counties
#1 Industrial Park Dr.
Hillsboro, IL 62049
Hours: Monday - Friday 8 am to 12 pm, 1 pm to 4:30 pm
1120 N Webster St.
Taylorville, IL 62568
Hours: Monday - Friday 8am to 11:30am, 12:30pm to 4.30pm
201 W. Exchange St.
Jerseyville, IL 62052
Hours: Tuesday & Wednesday 8 am to 12 pm and 1 pm to 4:30 pm and Thursday 8 am to 12 pm
#60 Carlinville Plaza
Carlinville, IL 62626
Hours: Monday - Thursday 8 am to 12 pm; 1 pm to 4:30 pm
Cattle markets can recover
July 26, 2016
Source: Chris Hurt, 765-494-4273, email@example.com
News writer: Debra Levey Larson, 217-244-2880, firstname.lastname@example.org
URBANA, Ill. – Lower cattle prices have been the story this spring and summer. Beef supply has been large due to heavy placements of heavy calves and the beginning of more females coming to market as herd expansion may be slowing. According to a Purdue University Extension economist, retail beef prices have been slow to come down and this has limited consumer purchases of beef in relation to abundant pork and poultry supplies.
“Finished cattle prices have been on the skids since mid-March when prices reached near $140 per hundredweight,” says Chris Hurt. “By last week, prices had fallen to around $115. Noticing the bearish theme in the cash market, the futures market has suggested prices will drop another $5 by the end of this year and proceed downward to near $100 by next summer.”
Hurt says there are plenty of reasons why prices have fallen, the biggest being a large number of cattle coming out of feedlots in recent months.
“That story goes back even further to abundant grass which encouraged cow-calf operations and backgrounders to add more weight to calves before they entered the feedlot,” Hurt says. “As a result, there has been a shift to heavier weight placements. In the first half of this year, placements weighing 800 pounds and more represented a record 40 percent of all placements, compared to a longer-term average around 27 percent.”
According to Hurt, rapid placements of heavy calves meant that marketings were going to rise sharply. Marketings out of feedlots were up 5 percent in May and then up a sharp 10 percent in June. Contributing to higher recent marketings has been a shift to lower slaughter weights since May which has served to “pull cattle forward.” This shift to lighter weights is probably related to the falling finished cattle prices and the desire of feedlot managers to get cattle to market before prices dropped even more.
Because of these heavy marketings, beef production was up 5 percent in May and 10 percent in June compared to the same month in the previous year. The rapid marketings in recent months has reduced the total number on feed to just 1 percent higher than a year ago according to USDA. This should help ease the burdensome volume of cattle and encourage upward price movement.
Hurt says there are early signs that the expansion phase of this cattle cycle could be in the process of slowing. Lower finished cattle prices and extremely weak futures prices may be causing cattle producers to rethink any additional expansion plans. The calf prices implied by $100 finished cattle is simply not profitable for most cow-calf operations. If producers slow the rate of expansion, more females move to market providing added beef supply pressures to already declining cattle prices.
“The signs of slowing expansion are in the rate of increased female slaughter,” Hurt says. In June, the number of heifers processed was up relative to year-previous levels for the first time in several years. In addition, the number of beef cows processed in both May and June was up about 18 percent. For June, total females (heifers and all cows) processed were up 7 percent compared to year-earlier numbers.
“The total number of females in the processing mix remains low, so it is still too early to say this expansion phase has come to an end,” he adds. “However, these signs of higher numbers of females in the processing mix may be the first clues of what is to come.
“Retail beef prices have been slow to fall as much as needed to encourage consumers to buy the added beef supplies,” Hurt continues. “In June, USDA reported the composite retail beef price was $6.20 per pound. This compares to a record-high price of $6.41 per pound in May 2015. Recent retail prices were just 3 percent lower than the record high. In contrast, June retail pork prices were down 11 percent from their high.”
Farm level prices normally drop quickly, but retail prices are much slower to decline, Hurt says. This means the current margin between the farm price and the retail price is at a record-wide level. Packer margins are likely at record-high levels as well.
“As retail prices adjust downward over time, consumers will have more price incentives to buy beef and this could actually help strengthen farm level prices,” Hurt says.
With the number of cattle on feed only up 1 percent on July 1, there should be renewed hope for recovery in cattle prices, Hurt says. “The fact that marketing weights have come down is also an encouragement that feedlot managers are more current in their marketings. In addition, over coming months, retail beef prices should also come down which will serve to narrow packer margins, but improve farm prices.”
According to Hurt, prices of finished cattle are expected to be in the mid-to-higher teens in the third quarter then move upward to the high teens to low $120s this fall.
“Recent live cattle futures prices have been extremely depressed, sending signals of much lower cash prices next year,” Hurt says. “Although prices are expected to be lower next year, they may not be as low as suggested by futures. Still, cow-calf managers will want to continue to be cautious about further expansion of the brood cowherd.”
Local Contact: Gary Letterly, Extension Educator, Energy and Environmental Stewardship, email@example.com