Nitrogen Applications for the 2012 Corn Crop
This article was originally published on May 23, 2012 and expired on June 23, 2012. It is provided here for archival purposes and may contain dated information.
While soil temperatures were
warmer than normal last winter, the dry soil conditions have resulted in very
little nitrogen loss this spring.
According to assistant professor
of crop sciences Fabian Fernandez, soils in the state were dry at the beginning
of autumn 2011, with above-average precipitation levels only during November
and December.
"In March, I predicted that
the risk of nitrogen loss would increase only if the spring became too
wet," said Fernandez. Precipitation thus far this year is, overall, below
average in the state.. Thus, so far, the likelihood of nitrogen loss this year
is very low.
Taking a look at soil nitrogen
also provides evidence that applied nitrogen remains in the soil.
"Nitrification has
proceeded quickly this spring," Fernandez said. In central Illinois, a
field with anhydrous ammonia plus NServe applied in November 2011 contained 80
ppm ammonium in the top 12 inches of soil at the end of February. Now, in
mid-May, the concentration is 27 ppm. During the same time interval, nitrate
concentrations have increased from 10 to 31 ppm. Although ammonium has
transformed to nitrate, there is still a considerable amount of ammonium in the
soil, probably because not all of it has been nitrified and also because
organic nitrogen in the soil is being mineralized to ammonium.
Last week, samples were also
collected for the 12- to 24-inch depth. As expected, there has not been
sufficient water to move nitrate down the profile and nitrogen concentrations
were low: soil nitrate was only 9 ppm and soil ammonium was 3 ppm.
At this time, most corn is
growing rapidly and starting to take up nitrogen. "If all the nitrogen has
already been applied, I do not anticipate a need to apply additional nitrogen
for this crop," Fernandez said. "If no nitrogen or only a portion of
the nitrogen was applied, now is the time to start applying the balance of the
application."
The nitrogen needs of the corn
plant are low from the early vegetative development stages until about V5
(fifth-leaf stage). Most nitrogen is taken up during the V8 to VT (tassel)
stages. Soon after pollination, nitrogen uptake is essentially completed.
Because the potential for
nitrogen loss by leaching or denitrification at this time of the growing season
is very low and corn plants will soon enter a rapid nitrogen uptake phase,
Fernandez recommends not delaying the application. However, if farmers are not
quite ready, research has shown that the chance for yield loss due to nitrogen
stress is very low, even when applications are done as late as the V6
development stage, because in most soils in Illinois, mineralization of soil
organic nitrogen provides ample nitrogen for early crop demands. Moreover, if
part of the total nitrogen was already applied, a delay in applying the
remaining nitrogen is not likely to cause plant nitrogen stress.
In fields with low
nitrogen-supplying power (soils with low organic matter) or where no nitrogen
has been applied, early application (before the V6 development stage) is
recommended to avoid loss of yield potential. Another reason not to delay
application, especially because of the dry conditions this year, is that the
sooner nitrogen is applied, the greater chance it will have to be moved into
the root zone by rain.
"In my opinion, the best
options to sidedress nitrogen are to inject it into the soil or dribble it
between rows," Fernandez said. If anhydrous ammonia is used, make sure the
knife track gets properly sealed to avoid crop injury from free ammonia
escaping to the atmosphere.
While most fields look very dry
on the surface, adequate moisture is still present below the surface to retain
the ammonia. According to Fernandez, "If the application is done at least
6 inches below the surface in fine-textured soils or at least 8 inches below
the surface in coarse-textured soils, there should not be problems with ammonia
volatilization." The advantage of dribbling nitrogen between crop rows
over broadcast applications is that dribbling reduces the potential for
volatilization of urea-containing fertilizers (urea and UAN) and reduces
fertilizer contact with the foliage, thus reducing foliar damage.
If injection or dribbling
options are not available, Fernandez recommends broadcast urea. This product
has the least impact on leaf burn when compared to UAN, ammonium nitrate, or
ammonium sulfate. If the canopy is wet, it is best to wait until it dries to
minimize dry fertilizer adhesion to the leaves.
If there is not a high
likelihood of rain, Fernandez suggests applying urea with a urease inhibitor
(such as Agrotain) to minimize nitrogen volatilization. When urea is broadcast
on the soil surface without a urease inhibitor, nitrogen losses start to
increase 3 to 4 days after the application if there is no rain to incorporate
it. After 10 days without rain, as much as 30 percent of the application can be
lost. By contrast, ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate are not subject to
volatilization losses if left on the soil surface.
The least desirable option is to
broadcast a UAN solution because this application is most likely to injure the
crop. If no other options are available, the application should be done as soon
as possible because the smaller the plant, the less chance for fertilizer to
make contact with it.
Some studies have shown that
there is little damage if a UAN solution is broadcast when plants are about 6
inches tall. Similarly, for bigger plants (V4 stage), an application of up to
100 pounds of nitrogen per acre is unlikely to cause substantially reduced
yield. This kind of application is best done a few hours before rain so the
fertilizer can be washed off the leaves, although this is not advisable if a
herbicide is combined with the UAN application (read the label to ensure this
is allowable). Also, be aware that including a herbicide with UAN can intensify
leaf burn damage.
Source: Fabian Fernandez, Assistant Professor, fernande@illinois.edu
Pull date: June 23, 2012
|